Was that a beast encouraging terrorists, tinkering with tools of bulk destruction or waging conflict on minorities in his state? No, it had been Thabo Mbeki, president of South Africa.His "crime" was indicating that his country evaluation the security of AIDS drugs.Then, adding gas to the debate, in March 2000, President Mbeki asked about 30 HIV-AIDS scientists to his presidential AIDS section in Pretoria, including two National biochemists, Peter Duesberg and Brian Rasnick.These two Ph.D.s from the University of Colorado at Berkeley are oral dissidents of main-stream considering HIV and AIDS.It is evident that Mbeki is no beast, but is he misinformed and misguided to question the security of AIDS drugs and the absolute equation HIV = AIDS?
It was May 23, 1984, when Robert Gallo, M.D., of the National Cancer Institute, reported he had discovered the "potential cause of AIDS." It was, he said, a new retrovirus that he called HTLV-III (human T-cell lymphotropic virus III), which was later renamed HIV.Gallo's evidence because of this declare was not the particular isolation of a disease, however the detection of antibodies in many but not totally all AIDS people he and his colleagues had analyzed. (It proved that Luc Montagnier, M.D., of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, had provided Gallo with sample disease evidence the previous year, and has become provided credit whilst the "co-discoverer of HIV.")So good was the horror and hysteria encompassing AIDS this news was instantly greeted much less a likely speculation but as fact by the press and public.
There have been protests from the very beginning around this leap of faith, but, verbal by some really outstanding researchers. One of Coluracetam powder was Kary Mullis, Ph.D., who obtained the 1993 Nobel Reward in chemistry for the innovation of the Polymerase Cycle Response check, a mainstay of AIDS research technology. In 1992 he said, "Nobody within their correct brain might leap into this issue like [Gallo et al.] did. It'd nothing related to any well-considered science. There have been some people who'd AIDS and a number of them had HIV not even all of them. Therefore they had a correlation. So what?"
Really, scientists from prestigious institutions throughout the earth pointed out several inconsistencies and contradictions in the "HIV = AIDS" theory. But, as Mbeki himself said in a page he wrote to then - President Clinton, there is a "campaign of intellectual intimidation and terrorism" comparable to "ancient book-burning" to keep substitute concepts concerning the reasons for the disease from being heard.
There are two alleged AIDS checks the ELISA (enzyme connected immunosorbant assay) and the European Mark test. Neither of the tests detect the disease; they identify antibodies that your body may make in a reaction to a number of stimuli. False HIV positives have already been due to at least 66 noted unrelated health conditions, medications and different facets, including food allergies, vaccinations, body transfusions, proteins on check filtration paper and a bunch of other viruses, germs and parasites.
It was May 23, 1984, when Robert Gallo, M.D., of the National Cancer Institute, reported he had discovered the "potential cause of AIDS." It was, he said, a new retrovirus that he called HTLV-III (human T-cell lymphotropic virus III), which was later renamed HIV.Gallo's evidence because of this declare was not the particular isolation of a disease, however the detection of antibodies in many but not totally all AIDS people he and his colleagues had analyzed. (It proved that Luc Montagnier, M.D., of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, had provided Gallo with sample disease evidence the previous year, and has become provided credit whilst the "co-discoverer of HIV.")So good was the horror and hysteria encompassing AIDS this news was instantly greeted much less a likely speculation but as fact by the press and public.
There have been protests from the very beginning around this leap of faith, but, verbal by some really outstanding researchers. One of Coluracetam powder was Kary Mullis, Ph.D., who obtained the 1993 Nobel Reward in chemistry for the innovation of the Polymerase Cycle Response check, a mainstay of AIDS research technology. In 1992 he said, "Nobody within their correct brain might leap into this issue like [Gallo et al.] did. It'd nothing related to any well-considered science. There have been some people who'd AIDS and a number of them had HIV not even all of them. Therefore they had a correlation. So what?"
Really, scientists from prestigious institutions throughout the earth pointed out several inconsistencies and contradictions in the "HIV = AIDS" theory. But, as Mbeki himself said in a page he wrote to then - President Clinton, there is a "campaign of intellectual intimidation and terrorism" comparable to "ancient book-burning" to keep substitute concepts concerning the reasons for the disease from being heard.
There are two alleged AIDS checks the ELISA (enzyme connected immunosorbant assay) and the European Mark test. Neither of the tests detect the disease; they identify antibodies that your body may make in a reaction to a number of stimuli. False HIV positives have already been due to at least 66 noted unrelated health conditions, medications and different facets, including food allergies, vaccinations, body transfusions, proteins on check filtration paper and a bunch of other viruses, germs and parasites.
Comments
Post a Comment